An Op-Ed By Audley Astwood
Politics is all about connection. It's about listening to people. It's about addressing their concerns. It's about offering genuine hope. All of which the People’s Democratic Movement (PDM) can't seem to understand. Voters in 2021 spoke loudly by handing the Progressive National Party (PNP) a landslide victory. Here we are now in 2025. Voters didn’t just whisper the same message—they shouted it, and they did so with an even bigger megaphone.
The PNP swept all At-Large seats this time, again sidelining the PDM. How did the PDM lose twice in a row, and in such a dramatic fashion? A single loss can be chalked up to a bad cycle in politics. Two losses in a row. Both by large margins. It all points to a deeper concern. It signals a mismatch between what the voters want and the PDM offers.
In 2021, PDM was weighed down by voter frustration over the cost of living, job shortages, and leadership that often seemed disconnected. The PNP capitalized on these issues with a clear platform, strong communication, and promises of tangible relief. Voters rewarded that approach with a resounding “yes.” When 2025 rolled around, the PDM tried to change the tune by criticizing the PNP’s record on crime and economic growth. But it didn’t stick, because voters saw more progress than pitfalls—more policies that worked than promises broken.
It’s as if the electorate is telling the PDM, “We’re not interested in hearing why the other side is wrong. We want to know why you’re right.” Voters are tired of recycled ideas. Voters crave fresh faces. They crave inventive proposals. And they crave leaders who genuinely understand day-to-day struggles. Offering more of the same or pointing fingers without offering solutions won’t cut it.
The PDM’s performance in Grand Turk South looked like a brief spark rather than a lasting flame. In fact, the PDM leader lost ground, with the PNP candidate coming within a slim 38 votes. You might wonder if the independent candidate was the spoiler—siphoning just enough support to deny the PNP a surprise victory.
Grand gestures and last-minute appeals won’t reignite voter excitement on their own. If the PDM wants a real revival, it must invest in genuine engagement: knock on doors, listen to community leaders, and craft everyday policies that resonate with real people.
Sometimes, a party has to lose to learn. Two defeats in a row is the political equivalent of a wake-up call with the volume turned up. The path to redemption for the PDM lies in modernizing the platform, reshaping leadership, and rebuilding trust from the ground up. Actions—community projects, economic initiatives, and visible problem-solving—speak louder than any campaign ad or social media blast.
What are voters really saying to the PDM? They want bold solutions rooted in reality. They don't want fear mongering. They want leaders who show up, not just for the cameras, but for the long haul. They want fresh energy and direct answers, not warmed-over rhetoric.
The PDM needs to be dismantled and put back together with a full new slate of candidates. If the PDM truly listens, it can reinvent itself and get back in the game. If not, the next election might look an awful lot like the last two—and by then, the door to victory could be permanently shut.
Comments