top of page
Writer's pictureNewslineTCI

Promise Versus Performance Gap of the PDM

An OpEd by Audley Astwood

Who just returned from a pilgrimage of enlightenment in the mountains of Tibet? Apparently, it’s the People's Democratic Movement (PDM), claiming they possess the solution to every problem our nation faces.


However, a critical examination of their claims versus their track record in public office reveals a stark contrast that deserves further scrutiny.


During their previous tenure, the PDM made numerous promises, covering everything from economic revitalization to improvements in public services. Yet, the outcomes often fell short of these overly exaggerated declarations. Today, as they boast comprehensive solutions, the voters of Turks and Caicos must ask: What has changed?


The issue is not merely one of unfulfilled promises—a common pitfall in politics—but of the broader implications such rhetoric holds for governance and public trust. When a political party doesn't keep its promises and then comes back with new promises, it makes people feel cynical. Voters get tired and start to doubt whether these promises can really happen. This doubt can hurt our democracy, making fewer people want to vote or care about politics.


Moreover, the discrepancy between past promises and achievements calls for a dialogue on accountability. The PDM's previous governance period was marked by unmet expectations and a lack of transparent evaluation of its own performance. Accountability is not merely a buzzword in public administration. It's a cornerstone of effective governance. It's through accountability that trust is built between the government and the governed.


The PDM's reemergence with newfound solutions offers an opportunity for the party to demonstrate how it has learned from its past shortcomings. However, it is also a moment for the electorate to demand evidence of this learning. Have there been shifts in policy-making approaches? What specific strategies are in place to avoid past mistakes? These are critical questions that need answers.


Furthermore, the PDM's current claims also spotlight the need for strong political talks on the feasibility and sustainability of proposed solutions. It's common knowledge that promises that are too good to be true often are. Our country faces unique socio-economic challenges that require carefully planned policies, not just attractive electoral promises. The community deserves detailed, clear, practical roadmaps for implementing proposed policies.


Contrastingly, the Progressive National Party (PNP) presents a narrative grounded in ongoing engagement and tangible outcomes. The PNP's approach to steady progress highlights a commitment to realistic and sustainable development. The electorate must compare the track records and not just the promises of both parties.


The role of the media and civil society becomes indispensable in this context. As watchdogs of democracy, they must rigorously scrutinize all political claims. Fact-checking, debates, and policy analysis should be the tools through which promises are filtered. The electorate must be equipped with all pertinent information to make informed decisions.


Engagement is the antidote to PDM's political disillusionment. We must not be passive recipients of promises. Instead, we must be active participants in a dialogue that shapes the future of our community. Voter education campaigns, community forums, and increased transparency from political parties can bridge the gap between promises and performance.


As the PDM boasts that they have endless solutions, the Turks and Caicos Islands electorate must critically examine these claims. The past may not always dictate the future. However, it often offers valuable lessons that cannot be ignored. The voters have a right to demand not just promises but a clear vision for the future. Through informed and active participation, TCI can hope to achieve the governance it truly deserves.


As the 2025 elections approach, let's remember that our vote is not just a choice between parties but a statement of our expectations. We must choose leaders not by the charm of their promises but by the credibility of their records and the clarity of their plans for our future. The PDM has failed to prove it has bridged the gap between its promises and its performance. The current administration is stable, competent, and reliable. I thank God that our country is in capable hands now. God bless our beautiful by nature Turks and Caicos Islands.

0 comments

Comments


bottom of page